Audio is as important to Apollo Justice's atmosphere as any other game. While the audio is not essential to the plot, it does add to the overall enjoyment. The only spoken dialogue comes about when Apollo or Klavier shout "OBJECTION!" "TAKE THAT!" or "HOLD IT!". This had basically been a staple of all four Ace Attorney games. The voice even changes depending on the character. These voiceovers are not exactly used for any narration or dialogue, and are used more for sound effect purposes. I did notice, however, that when Phoenix shouted "OBJECTION!" during the first case where he was the defendent, my heart almost skipped a beat as I recognized his voice from the previos games. Phoenix was known to shout "OBJECTION!" at pretty much anything that moved. When he yelled it instead of Apollo during the first trial, I was immediately nostalgic, as an Ace Attorney fan.
The music is all in MIDI format, with semi-okay quality. I've played other DS games with better music. This music is fitting of Gameboy Advanced games instead of DS. Because of this, I feel like I can group together the four games and talk about all of their audio at the same time. The sound effects in the Ace Attorney games are few and far between, and only subtely add to the atmosphere. Effects include when the judge's gavel hits, when Apollo's slams his fists down on the table in court, when ink or powder needs to be used in fingerprinting, or when a gunshot is fired during a cut scene. Without these effects, and without the background noise during exploration, I would definitely notice a change. Music plays throughout the entire game, and changes depending on mood. If the player finds themselves suddenly wrapped up in a mysterious event while investigating, the music will change to fit the dramatic mood.
The soundtrack for Apollo Justice is similar in atmospheric feel to that of the previous Ace Attorney games. The epic chiming music that always plays when entering the courtroom makes me laugh, reminding me that a court battle can have something in common with a Pokemon battle after all. All the music is score and it always loops (which is good, considering there are not time limits), not songs. I don't know if the DS has any games with songs that have vocals or well-known artists. But then again, I don't play very many DS games.
Sunday, March 29, 2009
Sunday, March 22, 2009
More Gameplay, Level
My images are not working right now, so for now just bear with me guys ><.
There's only one winner in Apollo Justice, unless of course you count the defendant as a winner along with you as the attorney. The game's victory conditions are mostly based on Apollo being competent enough at defending to get a Not Guilty verdict. In a way, there are four victories- one for case that the player must get through, each having basically the same condition. I wish there were multiple victory conditions, but the story doesn't really work any other way than defending someone in court. Implicit loss conditions are the same, of course: you lose if you get the Guilty verdict.
Game theory applied to the types of conflicts that exist in a game, and hoe the player responds to the conflicts. Apollo has more challenges in the game than one might think. For the most part, the challenges are "zero-sum", which means that it is impossible for both sides to ulitimately get what they want. However, the night is still young. I have not played the final case yet, but I wonder if Apollo may end up helping the prosecutor somehow. In previous games, Phoenix would win a case against Edgeworth for the sole purpose of helping Edgeworth get the not guilty verdict on a case he was forced to participate in. Challenges are based mostly on the story, but there it really no strategy involved in order to get past these challenges-the player will always figure out what to do eventually, without having to worry about any other players standing in their way. I found these specific challenges in Apollo Justice: Advancement to reach a the second day of each trial; puzzle-solving when figuring out codes for safes and footprint analysis; exploration of each area that might include evidence or people to talk to; conflict between the two sides in court; and outwit, which uses knowledge to defeat the opponent (Apollo has to do a great deal of this last one).
Types of challenges relate to the genre, and I can say with ease that no part of Apollo Justice seems innapropriate for the adventure-visual novel-comedy genre combo. Apollo is provided with a lot of imperfect information. It's all part of the challenge of being a defense attorney- he gets evidence that he doesn't fully understand, and then must make the best desicision he can with this evidence in court. Imperfect information like the evidence allows the player to feel more engaged in participating in the world of Apollo Justice. It's almost like a mystery, as you don't know what evidence is going to prove what until a witness triggors Apollo's thought process. Sometimes the player themselves doesn't even know how Apollo is going to explain the evidence. However, extrinsic knowledge can be of great assistence to the player, especially when it comes to understanding the evidence. The court system in Apollo Justice is not exactly a mirror image of ANY real court system, so the extrinsic knowledge can only go so far to meet the challenges of the game.
Apollo Justice does incorporate level into the gameplay. Different environments, differerent days of investigation and trial, different missions that must be accomplished before trial begins...these are all part of level design. The levels help structure the game mostly, dividing two investigation days and two trial days. The objective of the investigation levels are to explore each area and find every piece of evidence and get all information from people you meet. Only then will the game allow you to advance to trial. Think of the mess you'd be in if you went to trial without all the proper evidence! Actually, that might make the game a little more challenging to play...but also much more tedious. The investigation days have a particular flow: Apollo is prevented from gaining new information from a certain area until he picks up the right evidence from another area. If he doesn't find those lost medical forms in the safe, there's no way he can get medical information from the retired doctor who's helping with the case. Some of these objectives are self-explanitory, and some the player really has to think about. Like, how was I supposed to know that the slippers I found in the garbage can would unlock a new piece of information if I present them to the police detective?
As far as progression is concerned, the game doesn't exactly get more difficult with each level. However, each of the four cases are more difficult than the first. They build on Apollo's skill and confidence that he gains in the prior cases. Other than this, difficulty is mostly flat. The player will not find the fourth case horrifyingly difficult compared to the first, although the unfolding murder story in the fourth case may require investigation methods that differ from the methods of other cases.
The concept of time depends on the flow. Passage of time is a game characteristic- the date and time change with each level, but do not change until the player has found all evidence. The trial day, on the other hand, only changes when Apollo can prove that the case has enough evidence to extend the trial. Time does not pass until all goals are met...so there isn't a time limit (thank god!)
As I mentioned in previous entries, the POV changes: the player sees through Apollo's eyes during investigation, and the player follows the trials in third person in order to see Apollo's reactions in court (which are ALWAYS hilarious). The POV is related to the perspective, or how the player views the game environment. The view is mostly just side-scrolling- but each exploration area is mostly viewable completely in just one screen. The camera doesn't move a whole lot, as technically the only way you can move Apollo is if you leave an area and go to the next one. The boundaries of the game limit the player to about a dozen investigation screens per case. Scale is never distorted- the size of the space is not much of an issue when looking through Apollo's eyes. He could be standing at virtually any distance. The evidence can be analyzed by zooming in using the menu options.
There's only one winner in Apollo Justice, unless of course you count the defendant as a winner along with you as the attorney. The game's victory conditions are mostly based on Apollo being competent enough at defending to get a Not Guilty verdict. In a way, there are four victories- one for case that the player must get through, each having basically the same condition. I wish there were multiple victory conditions, but the story doesn't really work any other way than defending someone in court. Implicit loss conditions are the same, of course: you lose if you get the Guilty verdict.
Game theory applied to the types of conflicts that exist in a game, and hoe the player responds to the conflicts. Apollo has more challenges in the game than one might think. For the most part, the challenges are "zero-sum", which means that it is impossible for both sides to ulitimately get what they want. However, the night is still young. I have not played the final case yet, but I wonder if Apollo may end up helping the prosecutor somehow. In previous games, Phoenix would win a case against Edgeworth for the sole purpose of helping Edgeworth get the not guilty verdict on a case he was forced to participate in. Challenges are based mostly on the story, but there it really no strategy involved in order to get past these challenges-the player will always figure out what to do eventually, without having to worry about any other players standing in their way. I found these specific challenges in Apollo Justice: Advancement to reach a the second day of each trial; puzzle-solving when figuring out codes for safes and footprint analysis; exploration of each area that might include evidence or people to talk to; conflict between the two sides in court; and outwit, which uses knowledge to defeat the opponent (Apollo has to do a great deal of this last one).
Types of challenges relate to the genre, and I can say with ease that no part of Apollo Justice seems innapropriate for the adventure-visual novel-comedy genre combo. Apollo is provided with a lot of imperfect information. It's all part of the challenge of being a defense attorney- he gets evidence that he doesn't fully understand, and then must make the best desicision he can with this evidence in court. Imperfect information like the evidence allows the player to feel more engaged in participating in the world of Apollo Justice. It's almost like a mystery, as you don't know what evidence is going to prove what until a witness triggors Apollo's thought process. Sometimes the player themselves doesn't even know how Apollo is going to explain the evidence. However, extrinsic knowledge can be of great assistence to the player, especially when it comes to understanding the evidence. The court system in Apollo Justice is not exactly a mirror image of ANY real court system, so the extrinsic knowledge can only go so far to meet the challenges of the game.
Apollo Justice does incorporate level into the gameplay. Different environments, differerent days of investigation and trial, different missions that must be accomplished before trial begins...these are all part of level design. The levels help structure the game mostly, dividing two investigation days and two trial days. The objective of the investigation levels are to explore each area and find every piece of evidence and get all information from people you meet. Only then will the game allow you to advance to trial. Think of the mess you'd be in if you went to trial without all the proper evidence! Actually, that might make the game a little more challenging to play...but also much more tedious. The investigation days have a particular flow: Apollo is prevented from gaining new information from a certain area until he picks up the right evidence from another area. If he doesn't find those lost medical forms in the safe, there's no way he can get medical information from the retired doctor who's helping with the case. Some of these objectives are self-explanitory, and some the player really has to think about. Like, how was I supposed to know that the slippers I found in the garbage can would unlock a new piece of information if I present them to the police detective?
As far as progression is concerned, the game doesn't exactly get more difficult with each level. However, each of the four cases are more difficult than the first. They build on Apollo's skill and confidence that he gains in the prior cases. Other than this, difficulty is mostly flat. The player will not find the fourth case horrifyingly difficult compared to the first, although the unfolding murder story in the fourth case may require investigation methods that differ from the methods of other cases.
The concept of time depends on the flow. Passage of time is a game characteristic- the date and time change with each level, but do not change until the player has found all evidence. The trial day, on the other hand, only changes when Apollo can prove that the case has enough evidence to extend the trial. Time does not pass until all goals are met...so there isn't a time limit (thank god!)
As I mentioned in previous entries, the POV changes: the player sees through Apollo's eyes during investigation, and the player follows the trials in third person in order to see Apollo's reactions in court (which are ALWAYS hilarious). The POV is related to the perspective, or how the player views the game environment. The view is mostly just side-scrolling- but each exploration area is mostly viewable completely in just one screen. The camera doesn't move a whole lot, as technically the only way you can move Apollo is if you leave an area and go to the next one. The boundaries of the game limit the player to about a dozen investigation screens per case. Scale is never distorted- the size of the space is not much of an issue when looking through Apollo's eyes. He could be standing at virtually any distance. The evidence can be analyzed by zooming in using the menu options.
Sunday, March 1, 2009
Creative titles escape me...but this is a post on interface ><
Apollo Justice: Ace Attorney is, as I've mentioned before, not a quick game to play. The player has to invest a lot of time and patience and thought in order to get through the endless supply of witness testimonies and Ema's annoying banter. The courtroom sessions are the worst, especially if you're the type of person who wants to use their handheld console for quick and easy games. If they could have made Apollo Justice a computer game, I think at least then it would serve the right audience: those who have the time to sit in front of their computers for hours on end. The good part about all this is the saving interface. No matter how crazy the debate gets over saving a video game, that doesn't apply AT ALL for this one. The player is allowed to save an infinite amount of times to a single save slot on the game cartridge. There are so few ways to lose the game or do anything wrong, as I mentioned in my slightly bitter post from last week, that it doesn't seem like a problem to be able to save whenever I feel like it.
As far as the other active interface is concerned, the menu system allows for saving options, new game options, and (if you've finished previous cases) a chance to replay cases. Your inventory, expertise, and courtroom status bar does not carry over to each case. This allows for pretty much anyone to pick up your DS, play a case you've already beaten in pretty much the exact same way you did, and hand it back to you having not changed anything in the unplayed parts of the game. Heh, okay that doesn't really make sense. Basically, there is only one way to play the game, and everyone plays it the exact same way and needs to find the exact same evidence. Like I said, it's a novel disguised as a video game. And it's not exactly one of those cute "choose your own adventure" novels.
A lot of the active, manipulatable interface in Apollo Justice might be considered dysfunctional to anyone who's never played a visual novel type game before. The controls (such as the footprinting and analysis) can be pretty cryptic and seem to be an utterly useless way of adding DS touchscreen features to a game that REALLY does not need two screens.
In real life, you don't have the footprints of every single person you meet.
Nothing is customizable, and the tasks are defined. BUT! As an adventure type game, it does offer a few of the best types of interface for adventurers: inventory, navigation control (sort of), point-and-click, etc. The player does have a minimal amount of input, choices, and means on communication. I'm very happy that at least when you are talking to people, the game gives you choices of how you want to get the information out of them:
Apollo Justice offers some platform-specific features, but many I feel could be used with just one screen as well. However, the game does allow you to watch the action taking place, the areas being investigated, and the people talking, while also being able to check inventory and profiles at the same time. The options are always on the bottom touchscreen, while the action takes place on the top screen. Apollo Justice is the first Ace Attorney game to be originally created for the DS (the first three games were made for Gameboy Advance and then later adapted to the DS). This offer some new and interesting ways to use the touchscreen, such as the "perceive" function. This allows you to slow down the witnesses' testimony and zoom in on their appearance in order to watch their nervous habits while they lie to you on the witness stand. The zooming in is certainly not something a player could do without a touchscreen, although I suppose it's possible. I'm pretty sure that horrid footprinting business could be done on one screen as well.
Drugs, Apollo. LSD is what's going on.
Hmm, decisions, decisions.
I the passive interface in Apollo Justice is everything that player's cannot interact with or change. Although you can examine the evidence, you cannot alter your evidence or inventory. Locations can only be manipulated when you take evidence from the scene, and the Apollo's abilities will always be the same three things: "Take That!", "Hold It!", and "Objection!". Trucy, however, seems to be gaining more magical ability as the game progresses. Too bad she's not a psychic spirit medium like my assistant was in the previous Ace Attorney games.
Fighting-style splitscreen animation: because no courtroom is complete without a Pokemon battle.
You can't key this guy's car, but at least you get to analyze his girly cell phone. A mixture of active and passive interface.
Overall, the usability of Apollo Justice, based on the interface, is simplistic in spite of the long, drawn out storyline. The game would probably take FOREVER if the player was given more options and controls...and tampering with more than this game currently allows you t would probably not result in anything fitting to the storyline or characters. I am playing as a lawyer after all. Don't want to seem like I'm cheating too much.
As far as the other active interface is concerned, the menu system allows for saving options, new game options, and (if you've finished previous cases) a chance to replay cases. Your inventory, expertise, and courtroom status bar does not carry over to each case. This allows for pretty much anyone to pick up your DS, play a case you've already beaten in pretty much the exact same way you did, and hand it back to you having not changed anything in the unplayed parts of the game. Heh, okay that doesn't really make sense. Basically, there is only one way to play the game, and everyone plays it the exact same way and needs to find the exact same evidence. Like I said, it's a novel disguised as a video game. And it's not exactly one of those cute "choose your own adventure" novels.
A lot of the active, manipulatable interface in Apollo Justice might be considered dysfunctional to anyone who's never played a visual novel type game before. The controls (such as the footprinting and analysis) can be pretty cryptic and seem to be an utterly useless way of adding DS touchscreen features to a game that REALLY does not need two screens.
In real life, you don't have the footprints of every single person you meet.
Nothing is customizable, and the tasks are defined. BUT! As an adventure type game, it does offer a few of the best types of interface for adventurers: inventory, navigation control (sort of), point-and-click, etc. The player does have a minimal amount of input, choices, and means on communication. I'm very happy that at least when you are talking to people, the game gives you choices of how you want to get the information out of them:
Apollo Justice offers some platform-specific features, but many I feel could be used with just one screen as well. However, the game does allow you to watch the action taking place, the areas being investigated, and the people talking, while also being able to check inventory and profiles at the same time. The options are always on the bottom touchscreen, while the action takes place on the top screen. Apollo Justice is the first Ace Attorney game to be originally created for the DS (the first three games were made for Gameboy Advance and then later adapted to the DS). This offer some new and interesting ways to use the touchscreen, such as the "perceive" function. This allows you to slow down the witnesses' testimony and zoom in on their appearance in order to watch their nervous habits while they lie to you on the witness stand. The zooming in is certainly not something a player could do without a touchscreen, although I suppose it's possible. I'm pretty sure that horrid footprinting business could be done on one screen as well.
Drugs, Apollo. LSD is what's going on.
Hmm, decisions, decisions.
I the passive interface in Apollo Justice is everything that player's cannot interact with or change. Although you can examine the evidence, you cannot alter your evidence or inventory. Locations can only be manipulated when you take evidence from the scene, and the Apollo's abilities will always be the same three things: "Take That!", "Hold It!", and "Objection!". Trucy, however, seems to be gaining more magical ability as the game progresses. Too bad she's not a psychic spirit medium like my assistant was in the previous Ace Attorney games.
Fighting-style splitscreen animation: because no courtroom is complete without a Pokemon battle.
You can't key this guy's car, but at least you get to analyze his girly cell phone. A mixture of active and passive interface.
Overall, the usability of Apollo Justice, based on the interface, is simplistic in spite of the long, drawn out storyline. The game would probably take FOREVER if the player was given more options and controls...and tampering with more than this game currently allows you t would probably not result in anything fitting to the storyline or characters. I am playing as a lawyer after all. Don't want to seem like I'm cheating too much.
Sunday, February 22, 2009
Those spikes on your head are softer than they look
The rules of Apollo Justice aren't necessarily the same rules that apply in a court of law. One type of rule, called interplay rules, determines the physical laws, relationships, and properties of the elements of the game. How a person feels playing the game is directly related to what the rules allow you to do or not do.
And right now, I am wondering why the game has an implicit rule that you can't throw things at stupid people. I mean, honestly, why is the bailiff letting Trucy walk into court hiding a knife-wielding ventriloquist dummy under her cape?! I feel like Apollo is the only one being restricted in this game. During the investigation sessions, the player can only explore the still frame, caricaturistic areas set in the game. The player can examine dozens of odd items and scenery within the specific areas, but Apollo is the one who ultimately decides what to record as possible evidence.
I suppose that without this rule, there's no way I would get anything done. Actually, each time Apollo finds a piece of evidence or is able to get a certain character to spill the beans while investigating, another piece of the puzzle is unlocked. I can't get Phoenix to return to his hospital room until I've gotten Detective Skye to confess her relationship with him. And I can't get Skye to confess her relationship until I've presented evidence that suggests I am working for Phoenix Wright.
That being said, the interplay rules of the game use the player's input to determine what actually happens. While I can't control what Apollo asks when he presses the witnesses, the fact that I can press witnesses on any statement as many times as I like gives me ample opportunity to prove my client innocent. In real law, I don't think Apollo would have made it past the LSATs.
When Apollo says these three phrases, it's nice to actually hear vocalization for once. Puts an element into the game that helps me connect with the character. The audio in the game is mostly Pokemon-esque midi music, with the exception of the insane guitar riffs brought on by Prosecutor Gavin's theatrics. God, I wish I was allowed to throw the evidence in my court record at people's heads. Like that lamp with the broken bulb I was carrying around (or at least it's assumed I'm carrying it around, because I am somehow able to analyze it whenever I please. This, of course, is a game rule I am quite happy with).
And speaking of Gavin's theatrics, above is a picture of the prosecutor using air guitar to explain why he wanted the judge to deduct extra points from my status bar if I presented the wrong evidence. While Gavin is probably the hottest thing to ever walk into a courtroom, I don't think he should be telling the judge how to penalize me. The player is allowed to analyze the evidence and present it when the appropriate contradictory testimony arises...but I'm frustrated that I can't actually choose how Apollo explains his evidence. Evaluation rules (which decide which actions are rewarded or punished) come into play when Apollo presents evidence that is not appropriate for the testimony, or he chooses the wrong option to explain in an objection. The following two images show Apollo having to choose options, and then consequences that await his poor status bar when he does something wrong.
I'm completely fed up with the inability to actually do something wrong in Apollo Justice. It's completely useless to be using the DS touch screen to pour cement into a footprint mold, when there's absolutely no consequence for doing it wrong! So basically, as I mentioned before, the only way to actually lose the Apollo Justice game is to present the wrong evidence four or five times when you're cross-examining in court. The only alternative would be to become so frustrated with the investigation that you turn off the game, yank it out of the DS, and chuck it out the window/into the toilet. Then nobody would get the guilty sentence.
And right now, I am wondering why the game has an implicit rule that you can't throw things at stupid people. I mean, honestly, why is the bailiff letting Trucy walk into court hiding a knife-wielding ventriloquist dummy under her cape?! I feel like Apollo is the only one being restricted in this game. During the investigation sessions, the player can only explore the still frame, caricaturistic areas set in the game. The player can examine dozens of odd items and scenery within the specific areas, but Apollo is the one who ultimately decides what to record as possible evidence.
I suppose that without this rule, there's no way I would get anything done. Actually, each time Apollo finds a piece of evidence or is able to get a certain character to spill the beans while investigating, another piece of the puzzle is unlocked. I can't get Phoenix to return to his hospital room until I've gotten Detective Skye to confess her relationship with him. And I can't get Skye to confess her relationship until I've presented evidence that suggests I am working for Phoenix Wright.
That being said, the interplay rules of the game use the player's input to determine what actually happens. While I can't control what Apollo asks when he presses the witnesses, the fact that I can press witnesses on any statement as many times as I like gives me ample opportunity to prove my client innocent. In real law, I don't think Apollo would have made it past the LSATs.
When Apollo says these three phrases, it's nice to actually hear vocalization for once. Puts an element into the game that helps me connect with the character. The audio in the game is mostly Pokemon-esque midi music, with the exception of the insane guitar riffs brought on by Prosecutor Gavin's theatrics. God, I wish I was allowed to throw the evidence in my court record at people's heads. Like that lamp with the broken bulb I was carrying around (or at least it's assumed I'm carrying it around, because I am somehow able to analyze it whenever I please. This, of course, is a game rule I am quite happy with).
And speaking of Gavin's theatrics, above is a picture of the prosecutor using air guitar to explain why he wanted the judge to deduct extra points from my status bar if I presented the wrong evidence. While Gavin is probably the hottest thing to ever walk into a courtroom, I don't think he should be telling the judge how to penalize me. The player is allowed to analyze the evidence and present it when the appropriate contradictory testimony arises...but I'm frustrated that I can't actually choose how Apollo explains his evidence. Evaluation rules (which decide which actions are rewarded or punished) come into play when Apollo presents evidence that is not appropriate for the testimony, or he chooses the wrong option to explain in an objection. The following two images show Apollo having to choose options, and then consequences that await his poor status bar when he does something wrong.
I'm completely fed up with the inability to actually do something wrong in Apollo Justice. It's completely useless to be using the DS touch screen to pour cement into a footprint mold, when there's absolutely no consequence for doing it wrong! So basically, as I mentioned before, the only way to actually lose the Apollo Justice game is to present the wrong evidence four or five times when you're cross-examining in court. The only alternative would be to become so frustrated with the investigation that you turn off the game, yank it out of the DS, and chuck it out the window/into the toilet. Then nobody would get the guilty sentence.
Sunday, February 15, 2009
Hit me with the guilty verdict, G!
I love talking about the characters in pretty much any series I've seen, read, played, or heard about. And the reason I love the Ace Attorney games so much is primarily for the dynamic characters. I've heard Apollo Justice described as being a "novel disguised as a game". To some extent, I agree. Although I would probably amend this to say that it's an anime disguised as a game, at least in the department of characters. All of the characters in the game are created for the game, which classifies them all as fantasy characters. Since it's supposed to take place in modern-day Japan (or possibly San Fransisco in the English version), I'd have to classify them all as human characters as well.
I played through the second case, "Turnabout Corner", and I can already tell that our protagonist Apollo is going to be a transformational character. The weird part about playing as Apollo is that it's seems to be first-person POV for half of time (during investigation), and third-person for the rest (the trial). The only way I know what Apollo is doing during the investigation is by his running commentary. I said in a previous post that I felt sorry for Apollo...and I guess I still do. He's such a scaredy cat during both investigation and trial.
But! As you can see in the bottom two pics, some confidence is already transforming this poor lawyer's heart. Or...at least he understands what the lawbooks tell him (I can't say the same for Phoenix). The farther along I got into the case, the less he seemed to hide behind his assistant. This may be due to the fact that the prosecutor, who is supposed to be the antagonist (at least as far as I remembers from the previous games. The prosecutor in Justice For All actually knocks Phoenix unconscious with a whip in the middle of the courtroom) is actually not intimidating. AT ALL. The prosecutor, Klavier Gavin is actually the biggest playboy I've ever seen, and he hardly pays attention to the trial! I'm beginning to wonder if Klavier is also going to be a transformational character. Probably not for the good, however. We can't have him helping out the defense all the time like that sissy Edgeworth always did. Hahaha Edgeworth was such a pansy...okay I'll stop. We're talking about Klavier here.
The verbal interaction with Klavier Gavin clearly suggests that he is going to be obnoxiously German and obnoxiously...well, this:
I'm liking Klavier's character design. He's clearly hotter than Apollo will ever be, making him perfect for winning over the judge and getting witnesses to say whatever he wants them to. I certainly hope he actually does these things in the next couple cases...because otherwise I'm not going to have much trouble defeating him in court.
The fact that Apollo put Klavier's older brother in jail has been brought up numerous times. I'm just taking a wild guess here...but maybe the reason he's suddenly the prosecutor is because he wants revenge? Certainly it's not because he's in love with the defense attorney (I'm talking to you, Edgeworth...).
Apollo Justice, getting his Objection on.
Speaking of Phoenix, he'll be Apollo's mentor for the duration of the game. He's not exactly going to help me with much, though...because these seven years has somehow changed him from a kickass defense attorney to Mr. Vague.
Backstory!!! We're getting Phoenix's backstory!!!! Yes, it's just in a passing comment...but I know we're going to at some point be dealing directly with that case from seven years ago. I'm looking at that ridiculous "Papa" hat on his head, and remembering that I haven't introduced my lovely assistant--Trucy Wright! Magician extraordinaire, Phoenix Wright's "daughter", and a person who clearly knows more about law than Apollo (which means she also knows more than her father).
Trucy is cute, I'll give her that. Her commentary is hilarious and very reminiscent of Maya Fey. I don't think a fifteen year old girl is going to become the love interest for Apollo...but I think she's going to provide a lot of needed comic relief in this game. She's an ally-type character, helping me out with pretty much EVERY task that needs accomplishing. Not that I wouldn't be able to figure it out myself...but Apollo's apparently a very incompetent cross-examiner at this point in the game.
Judging by some of the one-liner comedy that's already come up during investigation, it's pretty obvious that these two are becoming fast friends. However, if she weren't already on my side, I'd have to call her a "trickster" type character...mostly due to the theatrics she's been displaying in the courtroom. Visually, I'd say her outfit fits her personality extraordinarily well.
Another character I'm going to just briefly mention (mostly because I don't know enough about her yet) is Ema Skye, the lovely police detective in charge of investigation. I'm glad she's not a complete dumbass like the previous detective was (his name- Dick Gumshoe. Yeah. Seriously). She's CLEARLY in love with Phoenix in a similar fashion to how Edgeworth was CLEARLY in love with Phoenix. The police detective character's job is to NOT help you out with your own investigation...while also inadvertently giving you all the information, clues, and evidence you need to get through the trial. At the very least, Ema's a neutral character who looks like she might play some sort of part in the assumed final trial dealing with Phoenix. I just have a hunch about these things.
Ema Skye, telling Apollo about her previous role in Death Note.
I'm not going to get much into the minor characters, as they change with each case. But one important thing to point out about the random people you meet while investigating is that you NEVER KNOW when one of them might turn up as a witness. Also, you NEVER KNOW when the sweet, innocent girl you meet in front of the local Japanese mafia's house might just turn out to be a cold-blooded killer. Even prosecutors themselves turned out to be murderers in the previous Ace Attorney games...so I wouldn't put it past Klavier to suddenly try and kill Trucy in the middle of the courtroom. That's how we know these cases don't actually take place in a true court system.
A character triangle is apparent between the defense attorney, the defendant, and the prosecutor. However, judging by this particular case's defendant...who was innocent but really wanted a guilty verdict...I'd say it's not always going to be that easy to figure out who's on my side. The odd theatrics displayed by the prosecutor and the witnesses help to bring out Apollo's true colors as a defense attorney. Sadly, Apollo's not one for theatrics himself (the complete opposite of Phoenix, who once cross-examined a radio).
I played through the second case, "Turnabout Corner", and I can already tell that our protagonist Apollo is going to be a transformational character. The weird part about playing as Apollo is that it's seems to be first-person POV for half of time (during investigation), and third-person for the rest (the trial). The only way I know what Apollo is doing during the investigation is by his running commentary. I said in a previous post that I felt sorry for Apollo...and I guess I still do. He's such a scaredy cat during both investigation and trial.
But! As you can see in the bottom two pics, some confidence is already transforming this poor lawyer's heart. Or...at least he understands what the lawbooks tell him (I can't say the same for Phoenix). The farther along I got into the case, the less he seemed to hide behind his assistant. This may be due to the fact that the prosecutor, who is supposed to be the antagonist (at least as far as I remembers from the previous games. The prosecutor in Justice For All actually knocks Phoenix unconscious with a whip in the middle of the courtroom) is actually not intimidating. AT ALL. The prosecutor, Klavier Gavin is actually the biggest playboy I've ever seen, and he hardly pays attention to the trial! I'm beginning to wonder if Klavier is also going to be a transformational character. Probably not for the good, however. We can't have him helping out the defense all the time like that sissy Edgeworth always did. Hahaha Edgeworth was such a pansy...okay I'll stop. We're talking about Klavier here.
The verbal interaction with Klavier Gavin clearly suggests that he is going to be obnoxiously German and obnoxiously...well, this:
I'm liking Klavier's character design. He's clearly hotter than Apollo will ever be, making him perfect for winning over the judge and getting witnesses to say whatever he wants them to. I certainly hope he actually does these things in the next couple cases...because otherwise I'm not going to have much trouble defeating him in court.
The fact that Apollo put Klavier's older brother in jail has been brought up numerous times. I'm just taking a wild guess here...but maybe the reason he's suddenly the prosecutor is because he wants revenge? Certainly it's not because he's in love with the defense attorney (I'm talking to you, Edgeworth...).
The characters reveal everything through dialogue in this game. Actually, dialogue is all that really happens in this game, hence the "novel disguised as a game" accusation. We do get some signature movements, however, that apparently Phoenix was too much of a hobo to copywright. Haha get it? Copywright. I'm so sorry ><. 
Apollo Justice, getting his Objection on.
Speaking of Phoenix, he'll be Apollo's mentor for the duration of the game. He's not exactly going to help me with much, though...because these seven years has somehow changed him from a kickass defense attorney to Mr. Vague.
Backstory!!! We're getting Phoenix's backstory!!!! Yes, it's just in a passing comment...but I know we're going to at some point be dealing directly with that case from seven years ago. I'm looking at that ridiculous "Papa" hat on his head, and remembering that I haven't introduced my lovely assistant--Trucy Wright! Magician extraordinaire, Phoenix Wright's "daughter", and a person who clearly knows more about law than Apollo (which means she also knows more than her father).
Trucy is cute, I'll give her that. Her commentary is hilarious and very reminiscent of Maya Fey. I don't think a fifteen year old girl is going to become the love interest for Apollo...but I think she's going to provide a lot of needed comic relief in this game. She's an ally-type character, helping me out with pretty much EVERY task that needs accomplishing. Not that I wouldn't be able to figure it out myself...but Apollo's apparently a very incompetent cross-examiner at this point in the game.
Judging by some of the one-liner comedy that's already come up during investigation, it's pretty obvious that these two are becoming fast friends. However, if she weren't already on my side, I'd have to call her a "trickster" type character...mostly due to the theatrics she's been displaying in the courtroom. Visually, I'd say her outfit fits her personality extraordinarily well.
Another character I'm going to just briefly mention (mostly because I don't know enough about her yet) is Ema Skye, the lovely police detective in charge of investigation. I'm glad she's not a complete dumbass like the previous detective was (his name- Dick Gumshoe. Yeah. Seriously). She's CLEARLY in love with Phoenix in a similar fashion to how Edgeworth was CLEARLY in love with Phoenix. The police detective character's job is to NOT help you out with your own investigation...while also inadvertently giving you all the information, clues, and evidence you need to get through the trial. At the very least, Ema's a neutral character who looks like she might play some sort of part in the assumed final trial dealing with Phoenix. I just have a hunch about these things.
Ema Skye, telling Apollo about her previous role in Death Note.
I'm not going to get much into the minor characters, as they change with each case. But one important thing to point out about the random people you meet while investigating is that you NEVER KNOW when one of them might turn up as a witness. Also, you NEVER KNOW when the sweet, innocent girl you meet in front of the local Japanese mafia's house might just turn out to be a cold-blooded killer. Even prosecutors themselves turned out to be murderers in the previous Ace Attorney games...so I wouldn't put it past Klavier to suddenly try and kill Trucy in the middle of the courtroom. That's how we know these cases don't actually take place in a true court system.
A character triangle is apparent between the defense attorney, the defendant, and the prosecutor. However, judging by this particular case's defendant...who was innocent but really wanted a guilty verdict...I'd say it's not always going to be that easy to figure out who's on my side. The odd theatrics displayed by the prosecutor and the witnesses help to bring out Apollo's true colors as a defense attorney. Sadly, Apollo's not one for theatrics himself (the complete opposite of Phoenix, who once cross-examined a radio).
Saturday, February 7, 2009
Isn't violence against hair a crime, Your Honor?
(Warning: contains spoilers for Apollo Justice)I am very happy to be analyzing the story for Apollo Justice: Ace Attorney a full seven months after I finished the first three Ace Attorney games. It gives me a fresher look at the characters, and I've lost most of my animosity for the replacement of Phoenix.
Oh course, it helps that Phoenix happens to be the defendant in the very first case! As immersed as I am in the fandom of GyakuSai (short for Gyakuten Saiban, the original Japanese title for the Ace Attorney games), I honestly had NO IDEA Phoenix would make a cameo in this game. From what I can tell, he's going to play an important part in the plot point that ties together each case...so why the heck isn't he on the cover?! 7 years after Trials and Tribulations and Phoenix has lost his badge and become a piano playing hobo and an expert poker player, sporting facial hair and what appears to be a beanie that says "Papa" on it. Okay wait. Blogs should have an automatic reject button for when I blabber on about fandom for too long. I'm really here to analyze the story.
I've completed the first case: "Turnabout Trump", which, as I had expected based on my knowledge of the previous games, was the one-day, beginner court case that doesn't involve any prior investigation. The prosecutor for every beginning case is wimpy Winston Payne (complete with 7 more years of balding), and the judge is still the same blissfully confused old man.
Apollo Justice, on the other hand, I actually feel sorry for. He's so cute and innocent...and I believe only 22 years old.
Here's our first glimpse of the main hero.
Apollo finds himself dropped into his first case as a defense attorney, originally supposed to go to his mentor, Kristoph Gavin. Kristoph and Phoenix appear to be friends, but there's some sort of hard to describe tension brewing between them as Phoenix insists on using Apollo as his attorney instead of his friend. Poor ickle Apollo is terrified of defending someone like the great Phoenix Wright (although he apparently knows more about Phoenix's tragic downfall than I do). It doesn't help that Kristoph Gavin is an inherently terrifying person, unlike the beautiful ghost of Mia Fey who used to help Phoenix out.
Kristoph Gavin: a man who would not get away with that hair in real life.
It was clear from the very beginning of the case that Phoenix was going to be the one leading Apollo through this battle, instead of this creepy Kristoph bloke. And he did. I felt a bit unneeded during this court case. Like, that Phoenix could have represented himself or something. Because he gave me a million vague, metaphorical hints in order to prove my client innocent. The plot of the case was simple: A man with a pun-tastic name (Shadi Smith) was murdered in a bar by Phoenix Wright after a poker game. After cross-examining both Phoenix and the typical two-faced witness (Olga Orly- last name clearly for the Internet fans), it is revealed that the murderer was actually Kristoph Gavin. Woah. Wait, isn't it supposed to work like this: Kristoph Gavin : Apollo Justice :: Mia Fey : Phoenix Wright ????
Phoenix's finger: doing what it does best.
What? Apollo's unemployed already? And what's with Phoenix's daughter who he clearly did not have with Maya Fey?
Underlying plot: My guess is that Phoenix's mysterious daughter (who I'm going to assume is adopted, judging by her age), the locket with said daughter's picture (which was around the victim's neck), and the court case that stripped the great Phoenix Wright of his lawyer status will play heavy roles in the Turnabouts that follow. Daughter seems cute and peppy enough to play the role of my sidekick, so I'm going to assume we will see her again. At the end of the case, Phoenix asks Apollo to come work for him. I don't know how this is going to play out, considering he's not a lawyer anymore.
Appeal: Although the first case never has much of a mystery, I was drawn into the game because of the anticipation that more is to come. A lot of foreshadowing has been chucked in my face here. In Trials and Tribulations, 3 of the 5 cases were tied together and had an underlying plot that had me screaming in surprise as the story unfolded. With Phoenix as a main plot point in Apollo Justice, I can already tell this game will be epic. My only worry is that some might not appreciate the Phoenix Wright-based story if they've never played the other Ace Attorney games.
Apollo Justice is bound to become an expert lawyer by the end of the game. Twisted murder plots always seem to find the main characters in the Ace Attorney games. My guess is that Apollo will be relatively close to a couple of those murders. It already happened in the first case.
"Grace juice"...sure.
Ooooh. The plot thickens in the very first Turnabout!
Friday, February 6, 2009
OBJECTION! A very special introduction to Ace Attorney
I've previously been very picky when it comes to playing games. I don't know how to categorize the list of games that I've played, but a small sampling of the titles would be: every Pokemon game ever, Hamtaro Ham-Ham Heartbreak, Strong Bad's Cool Game for Attractive People, Tiny Toon Adventures Buster and the Beanstalk, and, of course the three Phoenix Wright games.
I love Capcom's Phoenix Wright series. Any video game that has me crying, laughing, screaming, and frantically searching for walkthroughs at the same time, has potential to be the Best Game Ever in my book. When I choose an anime to watch, I generally go for the titles that have interesting characters. I found out this transfers to video games when I met the love of my life: Phoenix. Last summer, when I switched on my Nintendo DS and was immediately the defense attorney for a suspected murderer...I wondered how exactly can something like this be fun? You're not watching the murder. You're not investigating the murder. You're only pointing your finger at the witness stand and shooting your mouth off, right?
Right?
This is the way I describe Phoenix Wright to my friends. Me: "You get to play as a defense lawyer!"
Friend: "Oh really? That sounds boring."
Me: "The first game has a more interesting plot than all four Twilight books put together."
I love Capcom's Phoenix Wright series. Any video game that has me crying, laughing, screaming, and frantically searching for walkthroughs at the same time, has potential to be the Best Game Ever in my book. When I choose an anime to watch, I generally go for the titles that have interesting characters. I found out this transfers to video games when I met the love of my life: Phoenix. Last summer, when I switched on my Nintendo DS and was immediately the defense attorney for a suspected murderer...I wondered how exactly can something like this be fun? You're not watching the murder. You're not investigating the murder. You're only pointing your finger at the witness stand and shooting your mouth off, right?
Right?
This is the way I describe Phoenix Wright to my friends. Me: "You get to play as a defense lawyer!"
Friend: "Oh really? That sounds boring."
Me: "The first game has a more interesting plot than all four Twilight books put together."
Friend: "Oh really? That sounds boring."
Just kidding! In all seriousness, the plots of each episode (referred to as "Turnabouts") are mind boggling, hilarious, and highly engaging. It helps to have a vibrant cast of (anime-like) characters. It also helps that you don't play as just a defense attorney. The police detectives, witnesses, and even the prosecutors don't always do their job. It's a bird! It's a plane! No, it's SUPERLAWYER! The player finds all the evidence themselves...and even meets with witnesses beforehand. When in court, the player cross-examines witnesses, points out contradictions, and presents evidence in order to prove the defendant innocent.
A typical day for Phoenix Wright:
Just kidding! In all seriousness, the plots of each episode (referred to as "Turnabouts") are mind boggling, hilarious, and highly engaging. It helps to have a vibrant cast of (anime-like) characters. It also helps that you don't play as just a defense attorney. The police detectives, witnesses, and even the prosecutors don't always do their job. It's a bird! It's a plane! No, it's SUPERLAWYER! The player finds all the evidence themselves...and even meets with witnesses beforehand. When in court, the player cross-examines witnesses, points out contradictions, and presents evidence in order to prove the defendant innocent.
A typical day for Phoenix Wright:
Although originally made for Gameboy Advance, I played all three games (Phoenix Wright: Ace Attorney, Phoenix Wright: Ace Attorney-Justice for All, and Phoenix Wright: Ace Attorney-Trials and Tribulations) on Nintendo DS. Hardly any DS features were added to the gameplay, with the exception of a special bonus Turnabout added to the first game which involved using the touchscreen for fingerprinting.
Okay, that in no way summarized anything about the series. But this can:
That is what Phoenix Wright is all about.
That, however, is not what Apollo Justice: Ace Attorney is all about. You see, they replaced the beloved Phoenix as the main character in the fourth game of what is actually called the Ace Attorney series. So...I'm going to be blogging about my adventures in the world of Apollo Justice. I certainly hope he gives me as much joy as Phoenix did.
Subscribe to:
Posts (Atom)